Keywords
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.
Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Clinics in Sports MedicineReferences
- Incidence of anterior cruciate ligament tears and reconstruction: a 21-year population-based study.Am J Sports Med. 2016; 44: 1502-1507
- Cost effectiveness of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in young adults.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999; 367: 272-282
- Operation for repair of the crucial ligaments.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980; 147: 4-6
- Surgery for anterior cruciate ligament deficiency: a historical perspective.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012; 20: 5-47
- Age-related risk factors for revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cohort study of 21,304 patients from the Kaiser Permanente anterior cruciate ligament registry.Am J Sports Med. 2015; 44: 331-336
- The rate of subsequent surgery and predictors after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction two-and 6-year follow-up results from a multicenter cohort.Am J Sports Med. 2013; 41: 1534-1540
- Risk factors for recurrent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction a population study in Ontario, Canada, with 5-year follow-up.Am J Sports Med. 2013; 41: 2099-2107
- A systematic review of failed anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autograft compared with allograft in young patients.Sports Health. 2015; 7: 207-216
- Allograft versus autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction predictors of failure from a MOON prospective longitudinal cohort.Sports Health. 2011; 3: 73-81
- Risk factors and predictors of subsequent ACL injury in either knee after ACL reconstruction: prospective analysis of 2488 primary ACL reconstructions from the MOON cohort.Am J Sports Med. 2015; 43: 1583-1590
- Patient predictors of early revision surgery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction a cohort study of 16,930 patients with 2-year follow-up.Am J Sports Med. 2015; 43: 121-127
- Patients’ attitudes and factors in their selection of grafts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Knee. 2012; 19: 49-54
- What quality metrics is my hospital being evaluated on and what are the consequences?.J Arthroplasty. 2016; 31: 1139-1143
- Measuring quality in orthopaedic surgery: the use of metrics in quality management.Instr Course Lect. 2014; 63: 13
- Are validated questionnaires valid?.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005; 87: 1671-1672
- Analysis of subjective, objective and functional examination tests after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a follow-up of 527 patients.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1999; 7: 160-165
- Outcome measurement in the ACL deficient knee–what’s the score?.Knee. 2001; 8: 51-57
- Knee injury outcomes measures.J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2009; 17: 31-39
- Are articular cartilage lesions and meniscus tears predictive of IKDC, KOOS, and Marx activity level outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A 6-year multicenter cohort study.Am J Sports Med. 2014; 42: 1058-1067
- Intra-articular findings in primary and revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: a comparison of the MOON and MARS study groups.Am J Sports Med. 2011; 39: 1889-1893
- Guideline on anterior cruciate ligament injury: a multidisciplinary review by the Dutch Orthopaedic Association.Acta Orthop. 2012; 83: 379-386
- Autografts commonly used in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011; 19: 259-264
- Patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament rupture in adults.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011; (CD005960)
- Evaluation of the quadriceps tendon using 3-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging reconstruction applications for anterior cruciate ligament autograft choice and procurement.Am J Sports Med. 2013; 41: 2392-2399
- Quadriceps tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comprehensive review of current literature and systematic review of clinical results.Arthroscopy. 2015; 31: 541-554
- Biomechanical comparison of quadriceps and patellar tendon grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Arthroscopy. 2016; 32: 71-75
- Revision risk after allograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: association with graft processing techniques, patient characteristics, and graft type.Am J Sports Med. 2015; 43: 2696-2705
- Sterilization with electron beam irradiation influences the biomechanical properties and the early remodeling of tendon allografts for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL).Cell Tissue Bank. 2012; 13: 387-400
- Allograft safety in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Clin Sports Med. 2007; 26: 597-605
- The safe and effective use of allograft tissue–an update.Am J Sports Med. 2003; 31: 791-797
- The biochemical and histological effects of artificial ligament wear particles: in vitro and in vivo studies.Am J Sports Med. 1988; 16: 558-570
- Increased risk of revision with hamstring tendon grafts compared with patellar tendon grafts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a study of 12,643 patients from the Norwegian Cruciate Ligament Registry, 2004-2012.Am J Sports Med. 2014; 42: 285-291
- Risk of secondary injury in younger athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Am J Sports Med. 2016; 44: 1861-1876
- Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: bone-patellar tendon-bone compared with double semitendinosus and gracilis tendon grafts.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004; 86: 2143-2155
- A prospective randomized study of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction a comparison of patellar tendon and quadruple-strand semitendinosus/gracilis tendons fixed with bioabsorbable interference screws.Am J Sports Med. 2007; 35: 384-394
- A prospective randomized comparison of bone-patellar tendon-bone and hamstring grafts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Arthroscopy. 2005; 21: 34-42
- A prospective randomized comparison of patellar tendon versus semitendinosus and gracilis tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Am J Sports Med. 2002; 30: 214-220
- A prospective, randomized comparison of semitendinosus and gracilis tendon versus patellar tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: five-year follow-up.Am J Sports Med. 2006; 34: 1933-1940
- A randomized comparison of patellar tendon and hamstring tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Am J Sports Med. 2003; 31: 564-573
- Comparison of graft failure rate between autografts placed via an anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction technique a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.Am J Sports Med. 2016; 44: 1069-1079
- Hamstring strength recovery after hamstring tendon harvest for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison between graft types.Arthroscopy. 2010; 26: 462-469
- Does autograft choice determine intermediate-term outcome of ACL reconstruction?.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011; 19: 462-472
- The influence of graft choice on isokinetic muscle strength 4–24 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011; 19: 768-780
- Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: quadriceps versus patellar autograft.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008; 466: 198-204
- Rates and determinants of return to play after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in division 1 college football athletes: a study of the ACC, SEC, and PAC-12.Orthop J Sports Med. 2014; 2 (2325967114S2325900007)
- The prognosis and predictors of sports function and activity at minimum 6 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction a population cohort study.Am J Sports Med. 2011; 39: 348-359
- Is there a higher failure rate of allografts compared with autografts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses.Arthroscopy. 2015; 31: 364-372
- Autograft versus allograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and systematic review of overlapping systematic reviews.Arthroscopy. 2016; 32: 153-163
- ACL reconstruction in patients aged 40 years and older: a systematic review and introduction of a new methodology score for ACL studies.Am J Sports Med. 2013; 41: 2181-2190
- Effect of graft choice on the outcome of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the Multicenter ACL Revision Study (MARS) cohort.Am J Sports Med. 2014; 42: 2301-2310
- Factors influencing graft choice in revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the MARS group.J Knee Surg. 2016; 29: 458-463
Article info
Publication history
Footnotes
Disclosures: No relevant commercial or financial conflicts of interest (K.R. Duchman); consultant, Smith & Nephew (T.S. Lynch); National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases of the National Institutes of Health, Donjoy, and Smith & Nephew (K.P. Spindler).