Advertisement

Graft Selection in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Surgery

Who gets What and Why?
Published:October 14, 2016DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csm.2016.08.013

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.

      Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinics in Sports Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Sanders T.L.
        • Maradit Kremers H.
        • Bryan A.J.
        • et al.
        Incidence of anterior cruciate ligament tears and reconstruction: a 21-year population-based study.
        Am J Sports Med. 2016; 44: 1502-1507
        • Gottlob C.A.
        • Baker Jr., C.L.
        • Pellissier J.M.
        • et al.
        Cost effectiveness of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in young adults.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999; 367: 272-282
        • Hey Groves E.W.
        Operation for repair of the crucial ligaments.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980; 147: 4-6
        • Schindler O.S.
        Surgery for anterior cruciate ligament deficiency: a historical perspective.
        Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012; 20: 5-47
        • Maletis G.B.
        • Chen J.
        • Inacio M.C.
        • et al.
        Age-related risk factors for revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cohort study of 21,304 patients from the Kaiser Permanente anterior cruciate ligament registry.
        Am J Sports Med. 2015; 44: 331-336
        • Hettrich C.M.
        • Dunn W.R.
        • Reinke E.K.
        • et al.
        The rate of subsequent surgery and predictors after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction two-and 6-year follow-up results from a multicenter cohort.
        Am J Sports Med. 2013; 41: 1534-1540
        • Wasserstein D.
        • Khoshbin A.
        • Dwyer T.
        • et al.
        Risk factors for recurrent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction a population study in Ontario, Canada, with 5-year follow-up.
        Am J Sports Med. 2013; 41: 2099-2107
        • Wasserstein D.
        • Sheth U.
        • Cabrera A.
        • et al.
        A systematic review of failed anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autograft compared with allograft in young patients.
        Sports Health. 2015; 7: 207-216
        • Kaeding C.C.
        • Aros B.
        • Pedroza A.
        • et al.
        Allograft versus autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction predictors of failure from a MOON prospective longitudinal cohort.
        Sports Health. 2011; 3: 73-81
        • Kaeding C.C.
        • Pedroza A.D.
        • Reinke E.K.
        • et al.
        Risk factors and predictors of subsequent ACL injury in either knee after ACL reconstruction: prospective analysis of 2488 primary ACL reconstructions from the MOON cohort.
        Am J Sports Med. 2015; 43: 1583-1590
        • Andernord D.
        • Desai N.
        • Björnsson H.
        • et al.
        Patient predictors of early revision surgery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction a cohort study of 16,930 patients with 2-year follow-up.
        Am J Sports Med. 2015; 43: 121-127
        • Cheung S.C.
        • Allen C.R.
        • Gallo R.A.
        • et al.
        Patients’ attitudes and factors in their selection of grafts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
        Knee. 2012; 19: 49-54
        • Keswani A.
        • Uhler L.M.
        • Bozic K.J.
        What quality metrics is my hospital being evaluated on and what are the consequences?.
        J Arthroplasty. 2016; 31: 1139-1143
        • Bosco J.A.
        • Sachdev R.
        • Shapiro L.A.
        • et al.
        Measuring quality in orthopaedic surgery: the use of metrics in quality management.
        Instr Course Lect. 2014; 63: 13
        • Zarins B.
        Are validated questionnaires valid?.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005; 87: 1671-1672
        • Sernert N.
        • Kartus J.
        • Köhler K.
        • et al.
        Analysis of subjective, objective and functional examination tests after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a follow-up of 527 patients.
        Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1999; 7: 160-165
        • Johnson D.S.
        • Smith R.B.
        Outcome measurement in the ACL deficient knee–what’s the score?.
        Knee. 2001; 8: 51-57
        • Wright R.W.
        Knee injury outcomes measures.
        J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2009; 17: 31-39
        • Cox C.L.
        • Huston L.J.
        • Dunn W.R.
        • et al.
        Are articular cartilage lesions and meniscus tears predictive of IKDC, KOOS, and Marx activity level outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A 6-year multicenter cohort study.
        Am J Sports Med. 2014; 42: 1058-1067
        • Borchers J.R.
        • Kaeding C.C.
        • Pedroza A.D.
        • et al.
        Intra-articular findings in primary and revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: a comparison of the MOON and MARS study groups.
        Am J Sports Med. 2011; 39: 1889-1893
        • Meuffels D.E.
        • Poldervaart M.T.
        • Diercks R.L.
        • et al.
        Guideline on anterior cruciate ligament injury: a multidisciplinary review by the Dutch Orthopaedic Association.
        Acta Orthop. 2012; 83: 379-386
        • Shelton W.R.
        • Fagan B.C.
        Autografts commonly used in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
        J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011; 19: 259-264
        • Mohtadi N.
        • Chan D.S.
        • Dainty K.N.
        • et al.
        Patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament rupture in adults.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011; (CD005960)
        • Xerogeanes J.W.
        • Mitchell P.M.
        • Karasev P.A.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of the quadriceps tendon using 3-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging reconstruction applications for anterior cruciate ligament autograft choice and procurement.
        Am J Sports Med. 2013; 41: 2392-2399
        • Slone H.S.
        • Romine S.E.
        • Premkumar A.
        • et al.
        Quadriceps tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comprehensive review of current literature and systematic review of clinical results.
        Arthroscopy. 2015; 31: 541-554
        • Shani R.H.
        • Umpierez E.
        • Nasert M.
        • et al.
        Biomechanical comparison of quadriceps and patellar tendon grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
        Arthroscopy. 2016; 32: 71-75
        • Tejwani S.G.
        • Chen J.
        • Funahashi T.T.
        • et al.
        Revision risk after allograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: association with graft processing techniques, patient characteristics, and graft type.
        Am J Sports Med. 2015; 43: 2696-2705
        • Schmidt T.
        • Hoburg A.
        • Broziat C.
        • et al.
        Sterilization with electron beam irradiation influences the biomechanical properties and the early remodeling of tendon allografts for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL).
        Cell Tissue Bank. 2012; 13: 387-400
        • Cohen S.B.
        • Sekiya J.K.
        Allograft safety in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
        Clin Sports Med. 2007; 26: 597-605
        • Barbour S.A.
        • King W.
        The safe and effective use of allograft tissue–an update.
        Am J Sports Med. 2003; 31: 791-797
        • Olson E.J.
        • Kang J.D.
        • Fu F.H.
        • et al.
        The biochemical and histological effects of artificial ligament wear particles: in vitro and in vivo studies.
        Am J Sports Med. 1988; 16: 558-570
        • Persson A.
        • Fjeldsgaard K.
        • Gjertsen J.-E.
        • et al.
        Increased risk of revision with hamstring tendon grafts compared with patellar tendon grafts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a study of 12,643 patients from the Norwegian Cruciate Ligament Registry, 2004-2012.
        Am J Sports Med. 2014; 42: 285-291
        • Wiggins A.J.
        • Grandhi R.K.
        • Schneider D.K.
        • et al.
        Risk of secondary injury in younger athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Am J Sports Med. 2016; 44: 1861-1876
        • Aglietti P.
        • Giron F.
        • Buzzi R.
        • et al.
        Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: bone-patellar tendon-bone compared with double semitendinosus and gracilis tendon grafts.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004; 86: 2143-2155
        • Maletis G.B.
        • Cameron S.L.
        • Tengan J.J.
        • et al.
        A prospective randomized study of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction a comparison of patellar tendon and quadruple-strand semitendinosus/gracilis tendons fixed with bioabsorbable interference screws.
        Am J Sports Med. 2007; 35: 384-394
        • Laxdal G.
        • Kartus J.
        • Hansson L.
        • et al.
        A prospective randomized comparison of bone-patellar tendon-bone and hamstring grafts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
        Arthroscopy. 2005; 21: 34-42
        • Shaieb M.D.
        • Kan D.M.
        • Chang S.K.
        • et al.
        A prospective randomized comparison of patellar tendon versus semitendinosus and gracilis tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
        Am J Sports Med. 2002; 30: 214-220
        • Sajovic M.
        • Vengust V.
        • Komadina R.
        • et al.
        A prospective, randomized comparison of semitendinosus and gracilis tendon versus patellar tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: five-year follow-up.
        Am J Sports Med. 2006; 34: 1933-1940
        • Feller J.A.
        • Webster K.E.
        A randomized comparison of patellar tendon and hamstring tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
        Am J Sports Med. 2003; 31: 564-573
        • Gabler C.M.
        • Jacobs C.A.
        • Howard J.S.
        • et al.
        Comparison of graft failure rate between autografts placed via an anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction technique a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.
        Am J Sports Med. 2016; 44: 1069-1079
        • Ardern C.L.
        • Webster K.E.
        • Taylor N.F.
        • et al.
        Hamstring strength recovery after hamstring tendon harvest for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison between graft types.
        Arthroscopy. 2010; 26: 462-469
        • Magnussen R.A.
        • Carey J.L.
        • Spindler K.P.
        Does autograft choice determine intermediate-term outcome of ACL reconstruction?.
        Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011; 19: 462-472
        • Xergia S.A.
        • McClelland J.A.
        • Kvist J.
        • et al.
        The influence of graft choice on isokinetic muscle strength 4–24 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
        Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011; 19: 768-780
        • Han H.S.
        • Seong S.C.
        • Lee S.
        • et al.
        Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: quadriceps versus patellar autograft.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008; 466: 198-204
        • Daruwalla J.H.
        • Xerogeanes J.W.
        • Greis P.E.
        • et al.
        Rates and determinants of return to play after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in division 1 college football athletes: a study of the ACC, SEC, and PAC-12.
        Orthop J Sports Med. 2014; 2 (2325967114S2325900007)
        • Spindler K.P.
        • Huston L.J.
        • Wright R.W.
        • et al.
        The prognosis and predictors of sports function and activity at minimum 6 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction a population cohort study.
        Am J Sports Med. 2011; 39: 348-359
        • Mascarenhas R.
        • Erickson B.J.
        • Sayegh E.T.
        • et al.
        Is there a higher failure rate of allografts compared with autografts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses.
        Arthroscopy. 2015; 31: 364-372
        • Zeng C.
        • Gao S.G.
        • Li H.
        • et al.
        Autograft versus allograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and systematic review of overlapping systematic reviews.
        Arthroscopy. 2016; 32: 153-163
        • Brown C.A.
        • McAdams T.R.
        • Harris A.H.
        • et al.
        ACL reconstruction in patients aged 40 years and older: a systematic review and introduction of a new methodology score for ACL studies.
        Am J Sports Med. 2013; 41: 2181-2190
        • Wright R.W.
        • Huston L.J.
        • Haas A.K.
        • et al.
        Effect of graft choice on the outcome of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the Multicenter ACL Revision Study (MARS) cohort.
        Am J Sports Med. 2014; 42: 2301-2310
        • Group M.
        Factors influencing graft choice in revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the MARS group.
        J Knee Surg. 2016; 29: 458-463